A National Challenge in Corrections Staffing

Persistent staffing shortages are undermining safety, driving up costs, and weakening correctional systems nationwide.

Staffing Shortfalls Have Wide-Reaching Consequences

When state prisons cannot recruit and retain enough staff, the effects ripple across safety, budgets, and the lives of people working and living inside.

Health/Safety Impact

Since 2019, staff assaults rose 77%, assaults between incarcerated people 54%, and deaths in custody 45%.

Human Impact

About 200,000 people work as corrections officers, making DOCs among the largest state employers. Each year, hundreds of thousands leave prison, and millions have a family member working or living inside.

Fiscal Impact

In 2024, overtime costs topped $2B. Corrections alone made up 40%, fueled by vacancies and turnover that strain budgets and staff.

Limited Data
Limits Solutions

Most states do not share corrections workforce data. When reported, it is often incomplete, irregular, or limited to certain jobs or facilities.  National sources track overall employment, but not the details needed to see staffing gaps.  Without reliable data, leaders cannot identify risks, test strategies, or address instability.

There is no single fix.
States are pursuing varied strategies.

These examples show the range of efforts underway:
Wellness
Idaho

Hired a clinician as wellness coordinator and launched a staff app to track burnout and provide support.

Recruitment
Texas

Conducted in-depth analysis of recruiting targets and new correctional officers starting at TDCJ and calculated attrition rates for each targeted group; streamlined the process by providing recuiters more autonomy to decide which candidates to move forward.

Retention
Missouri

Revised training academy to offer more realistic training to new cadets; established tracking to gauge whether employee retention increased following the improvements to the academy.

There is no single fix – but states can act now by using better data to understand where staffing gaps are most severe and whether interventions are working.